In order to improve waste management systems in Reno, tt is a matter of pooling the efforts of public authorities, informal (but also formal) private entrepreneurs and the population.
The objective is no longer to substitute a formal system for an informal system, but to improve the articulation between these different systems.
This practice exists for waste management, but also for that of other urban services such as drinking water, sanitation or electricity. It is about the development of composite systems in which public management adjoins self-management and shared management.
Depending on the characteristics of each neighborhood, each population group, one or the other solution will be favored. The whole is then articulated in a composite system at the scale of the city of Renu, adapting to each district according to its potential.
In order to be able to function, the various players in local counties thus pool their resources, often spontaneously, in order to make the urban system work, including dumpster rental and recycling services. The recognition of this system by the local public authorities can encourage an attempt to better organize this pooling.
The shared waste management system currently operates at very fine scales, simply in a few neighborhoods targeted by the municipalities. Despite its interest, the question of its generalization remains unresolved. Its dissemination in more affluent neighborhoods (or even in more affluent US cities) could in particular pose difficulties in terms of the practices of the populations.
The argument of ecological sobriety can then be put forward to pool a socio-economic rationality with broader environmental issues, since in some cases, such as waste management, poverty is associated with eco-knowledge and to ecological sobriety.
Beyond the difficulties of legality of such an articulation between public institutions and informal actors, it remains to recognize in a more committed way the importance of recyclers, whatever their status, for the local and global environment.
Beyond the spatial approach carried out previously, the temporal approach can shed some additional light. The presentation in this article has, for example, some similarities with other typologies that show how waste management in Europe has evolved over time.
They thus distinguish an archaic system, where the very term waste did not exist since it was systematically recovered, a hygienic system (since the industrial revolution) which leads to the systematic destruction of waste and, finally, an economic system ( since the ecological awareness) where recycling allows to restore a monetary value to waste.
In modern times new waste management solutions are put in place to better manage wastage and junk. This includes recycling and sorting facilities, dumpster near me services available to the public in Nevada so they can easily discard their unneeded junk, reducing food waste and better awareness about sutainability and excess plastic usage.
This temporal typology of waste management in Europe is quite distinct from the spatial typology in Reno. However, certain points are comparable with regard to the approach to the waste object by the public authorities and by the populations. It is interesting to make these connections in order to better understand the challenges of waste management in the cities of the United States.